top of page

Why Women Are Always “Too Much” (And Why That’s the Point)

  • Mar 22
  • 3 min read

Updated: Mar 31

Strap in. This started as a thought about why women get called “a bit much” and has, predictably, spiralled into a full-blown feminist investigation.


You’ve been warned.


The Curious Case of “A Bit Much”

At some point in her life, every woman has been described as:

  • too loud

  • too emotional

  • too ambitious

  • too opinionated

  • too intense


Or, my personal favourite: “a bit much.”


Not wildly inappropriate. Not completely unhinged. Just… slightly exceeding the acceptable quota of female existence. Enough to be noticeable. Not enough to be respected.


Who Set the “Correct Amount of Woman”?

Because here’s the thing. Too much… compared to what?


Who decided the appropriate volume, ambition level, emotional range, or personality setting for women? Was there a memo? A dial? A quiet little council somewhere deciding:

“Yes, Janet. That’s enough personality for today. Any more and we’ll have to intervene.”

Because I missed that meeting.


The Historical Context (Yes, We’re Going There)

Women being “too much” is not new. Historically, women who stepped outside acceptable behaviour weren’t labelled bold or interesting.


They were labelled:

  • hysterical

  • difficult

  • unstable

  • a witch


The word hysteria itself comes from the Greek word hystera, meaning uterus. Which is just wildly efficient sexism, if you think about it.


For centuries, women’s emotions weren’t just inconvenient, they were medicalised. Too upset? Ill. Too angry? Ill. Too expressive? Definitely ill.


Diagnosis: woman.


The Modern Upgrade: From “Hysterical” to “A Bit Much”

We don’t say “hysterical” anymore (progress!), but we do say:

  • “intense”

  • “dramatic”

  • “hard work”

  • “a lot”


And of course: “a bit much.”


It’s softer. Politer. Socially acceptable. But it does the same job. It nudges women back into a smaller, quieter, more manageable shape.


Meanwhile, Men Are… What Exactly?

Let’s run a quick comparison.


A man who is:

  • loud → confident

  • direct → assertive

  • emotional (angery) → passionate

  • ambitious → driven


A woman who is:

  • loud → too much

  • direct → rude

  • emotional → unstable

  • ambitious → intimidating


Same traits. Different verdict. Fascinating.


The Social Penalty of Taking Up Space

Research in social psychology shows that women who display dominant or assertive behaviour are often judged more harshly than men displaying the same traits. In workplace studies, assertive women are more likely to be described as “unlikeable,” even when they are effective.


So the equation becomes:

Be small = be liked | Be big = be criticised

There's only one way to find out... (if you get that: I like you.)


The Double Bind (Or: The Personality Trap)

Women are expected to be:

  • warm but not weak

  • confident but not intimidating

  • funny but not crude

  • ambitious but not obsessed


It’s essentially a personality tightrope over a pit of social judgement. Lean one way? Too much. Lean the other? Not enough. Balance perfectly? Exhausting.


The Emotional Labour of Being “Appropriate”

So what happens? Women self-regulate. Constantly.

  • lowering our voices

  • softening our opinions

  • adding “just” and “sorry” into sentences

  • laughing when we’re not amused

  • shrinking, subtly, all day long


Not because they want to. Because it’s safer.


The Plot Twist: “Too Much” Is Actually the Point

Here’s the bit where it all flips. In actual real life, being “too much” actually means:

  • you’re expressing yourself honestly

  • you’re taking up space

  • you’re not editing your personality for comfort

  • you’re refusing to be quietly palatable


In other words: You’re not broken. You’re just not compliant.


A Radical Reframe

What if “too much” isn’t an insult?


What if it’s:

  • fully expressed

  • emotionally literate

  • unapologetically present

  • inconvenient to systems that rely on women being smaller


What if the goal isn’t to be less, but to be exactly as much as you are?


A Brief Note on Gifts (Because Of Course)

Let’s bring it back to where my brain always ends up: gifts.


If gift-giving is about signalling that we see and understand someone, then why are so many gifts designed to make women smaller, quieter, more acceptable?


“Relax.” “Smile more.” “Wine o’clock.”


Where are the gifts that say:

“You’re a lot. And that’s the best thing about you.”

This Is Where Everyday Womtras Come In (Obviously)

Everyday Womtras are, essentially, tiny acts of resistance. They say the things women are often encouraged to soften, filter, or swallow entirely. They’re not here to make you smaller.

They’re here to sit on your desk, your wall, your mug, and quietly (or loudly) remind you...


You are allowed to be:

  • loud

  • emotional

  • ambitious

  • chaotic

  • brilliant

  • and yes… a bit much


Final Thoughts (Before I Spiral Again)

The idea that women are “too much” only exists because the acceptable amount was set far too low. So here’s a radical suggestion: Don’t shrink. Raise the baseline. Speak your power. Live your womtra.

everyday womtra being "too much"

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page